Section · Administrative Rules of South Dakota · View on sdlegislature.gov ↗
method. The trend line and probation projections pursuant to SDCL 1-15-36 are based on the average annual percentage change in the end of the fiscal year count of adult felony probationers from fiscal year 2009 to fiscal year 2013, inclusive. The projected probation count for any county with an average annual increase of less than one percent is based on a zero percent growth rate. The projected probation count for any county with an average annual increase within the range of one percent to ten percent is based on the actual average increase. The projected probation count for any county with an average annual increase of ten percent or more is based on an increase of ten percent. The table below provides end of fiscal year adult felony probation counts for fiscal years 2009 to 2013, inclusive, the average annual percent change, and the factor used to make probation projections: County FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 5-Year Average Annual Percent Change Projection Factor Aurora 6 6 5 3 4 -5.83% 0.00% Beadle 73 67 94 109 97 9.26% 9.26% Bennett 6 7 9 9 19 39.09% 10.00% Bon Homme 0 3 5 9 10 39.44% 10.00% Brookings 100 101 114 139 144 9.85% 9.85% Brown 253 228 235 284 302 5.09% 5.09% Brule 24 25 26 26 33 8.77% 8.77% Buffalo 0 0 0 0 1 0.00% 0.00% Butte 37 43 50 59 76 19.83% 10.00% Campbell 0 0 0 2 3 12.50% 10.00% Charles Mix 48 41 44 54 74 13.12% 10.00% Clark 4 3 4 5 12 43.33% 10.00% Clay 46 48 57 71 90 18.60% 10.00% Codington 107 110 136 169 177 13.86% 10.00% Corson 1 1 1 2 4 50.00% 10.00% Custer 30 28 29 32 33 2.59% 2.59% Davison 120 138 152 169 168 8.93% 8.93% Day 0 0 3 7 15 61.90% 10.00% Deuel 5 8 9 10 8 15.90% 10.00% Dewey 4 4 5 7 8 19.82% 10.00% Douglas 1 2 3 5 5 54.17% 10.00% Edmunds 2 2 3 4 11 64.58% 10.00% Fall River 49 42 49 56 57 4.61% 4.61% Faulk 2 2 4 4 3 18.75% 10.00% Grant 0 0 1 5 10 125.00% 10.00% Gregory 3 4 6 7 8 28.57% 10.00% Haakon 6 6 4 6 7 8.33% 8.33% Hamlin 7 7 3 3 3 -14.29% 0.00% Hand 0 0 0 0 2 0.00% 0.00% Hanson 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% Harding 2 0 1 2 3 12.50% 10.00% Hughes 77 81 94 118 134 15.08% 10.00% Hutchinson 11 14 11 12 15 9.98% 9.98% Hyde 0 0 1 2 1 12.50% 10.00% Jackson 13 12 14 15 15 4.03% 4.03% Jerauld 0 0 0 2 7 62.50% 10.00% Jones 8 7 7 4 5 -7.59% 0.00% Kingsbury 0 0 1 2 8 75.00% 10.00% Lake 60 57 52 40 40 -9.21% 0.00% Lawrence 114 126 120 124 143 6.11% 6.11% Lincoln 60 55 39 23 74 35.82% 10.00% Lyman 19 18 14 16 19 1.39% 1.39% Marshall 0 0 0 1 6 125.00% 10.00% McCook 5 6 8 9 11 22.01% 10.00% McPherson 0 0 0 0 1 0.00% 0.00% Meade 133 116 139 167 189 10.09% 10.00% Mellette 10 10 10 13 9 -0.19% 0.00% Miner 0 0 0 1 1 0.00% 0.00% Minnehaha 710 797 947 1105 1284 15.99% 10.00% Moody 0 0 0 1 16 375.00% 10.00% Pennington 651 632 660 812 1006 12.11% 10.00% Perkins 8 12 15 19 23 30.68% 10.00% Potter 1 1 2 4 4 25.00% 10.00% Roberts 57 70 78 101 106 17.17% 10.00% Sanborn 0 0 0 0 2 0.00% 0.00% Oglala Lakota 2 2 2 2 2 0.00% 0.00% Spink 2 4 10 19 20 86.32% 10.00% Stanley 10 12 11 10 15 13.14% 10.00% Sully 6 4 3 7 6 15.18% 10.00% Todd 3 3 4 7 10 37.80% 10.00% Tripp 31 33 32 31 26 -3.96% 0.00% Turner 21 21 22 20 24 3.92% 3.92% Union 79 76 73 96 107 8.81% 8.81% Walworth 61 66 62 73 59 0.17% 0.00% Yankton 151 163 197 209 233 11.60% 10.00% Ziebach 2 2 2 2 3 12.50% 10.00%
Source: 41 SDR 53, October 6, 2014; SL 2015, ch 56, § 1, effective May 1, 2015.